Yesterday, Donald Rubenstein, Jackson
County Hearings Officer ruled against Mountain View Paving, denying
them a land-use permit for their Talent asphalt plant, shutting down
the business under threat of hefty fines.
Rubenstein's ruling was based on
supposed increased site activity and risk of fire. He also ruled that
the business was not grandfathered-in, due to a non-conforming use
differing from the business run previously at the site - a concrete plant. The campaign against the business was spear-headed by Steve
Rouse, President of Rogue Advocates, a local 'advocacy' group. Also, residents of a near by trailer park complained of the increased traffic and noise during summer months. Job creation is just a nuisance to some, apparently.
Question - who puts an old folks trailer park on a highway next to an industrial plant which has been in operation for many years? The previous business was grandfathered-in, obviously pre-dating the zoning regulation.
Once again, this is a case, just like
the Fielder Dam Removal scandal, where Donald Rubenstein's personal
life and ideologies are getting in the way of justice for citizens
and businesses of our region. Another glaring conflict of interest involving Mr. Rubenstein has reared it's ubiquitous head.
Pepper
Trail, a local radical enviro is a board member of Rogue
Advocates. He is deeply involved with Rubenstein's pet project
that nets millions of dollars each year, the Southern Oregon Land
Conservancy. Trail is a member of SOLC, a donor to SOLC, and a
speaker/presenter at SOLC events. This is clearly another conflict of interest, something Rubenstein excels at. (Below are just a few instances as
an example.)
When is Donald Rubenstein going to be removed
from his unelected office? When is this man going to be brought to
task for his conflicts of interest? When is Jackson County going to
cease allowing the Southern Oregon extremist environmental contingent
to run the county, destroy our businesses and jobs, and usurp our
private property rights?
Donald Rubenstein's roots in the
radical environmental movement all along the west coast run deep and
wide. He is a life-long enviro. He is a founder of several
environmental groups. He is steeped in agenda. His decisions are
not impartial. He is not forthcoming with adequate disclosures
regarding his relationships with the people who are attempting to
destroy our jobs and our private property rights.
Jackson County has become a joke. An
unfunny, offensive joke. The level of Boss Hog corruption is
legendary, and frankly, incredibly sad.
Rubenstein must go. He is not fit to
sit in judgment over us and does not possess an impartial eye. This
abuse of office to further his radical enviro agenda must end.
SOURCES -
Permit for Talent Paving Plant
Denied by Tony Boom (Mail Tribune, 29th September,
2015)
Oh, wait – I guess you can't answer
that, can you?
I mean, there's no way you can be
reading this, since you don't own a computer or a smartphone, because
they are made with rare earth minerals and you're rabidly
anti-mining, right?
And I guess you don't actually have a
house you could put that computer in either, since you're so
radically anti-logging and most houses are built with timber, right?
And I'm sure you would never sully your
green little organic cotton-clad derriere by sitting it in something
as crass as a motor vehicle, because they're made from the spoils of
the M word, just like most
other things that are not grown,
right?
And I know there's no way you could be
reading this, since, in actual fact, you are a real, true,
EnvironMENTAList running around completely naked in the woods,
foraging for roots and berries, right?
You're not?
Really?
You're sitting in your SUV checking
your email on your smartphone to see if the organization founded by a
LUMBER MAGNATE approved your application for a $100,000 grant, so you
can degrade more property rights and terrorize more innocent old
ladies, pollute some more rivers, and sue the piss out of the federal
government some more?
Well, you're just a great big
phony-ass, money-grabbing, land-stealing, anti-humanist, Agenda 21-pushing, hypocrite
then, aren't you?
Washington State Rep. Gael
Tarleton must have an incredibly firmly entrenched radical environmental
agenda. So much so, she doesn't even care that the inspiration
behind her anti-mining bill is a convicted felon, a thief, and a
fraudster.
Former
Attorney Kim McDonald Arrested – 7 Counts of Bank Fraud, 4 Counts
Mail Fraud
HB
2579, the Give
Fish a Chance Act (no, really,) is an
anti-mining bill that would restrict a federally-protected and
congressionally-granted right, supposedly in order to protect
endangered species of fish.
Tarleton pimped out Dr.
Fraudster's blog post about her scary encounter with – GASP! - a
miner! Eeeekkk! You can read the excruciating blog post if you
despise your eyes enough –
Kim McDonald is a
disbarred attorney, convicted felon (mail fraud / bank fraud) and is
the founder of Fish, Not Gold
(She is NOT to be confused with Washington attorney Kimberly A
McDonald.) McDonald raided the accounts of clients whose Trust Funds
she administrated. Her client list included basketball legend Chuck
Randall.
As a hate-monger toward
miners, McDonald regurgitates the same tired old manipulated study
that falsely shows digging a hole in the stream bed kills fish, when
in actual fact, dredging removes tons of fishing weights made from
lead, naturally-occurring mercury, and other junk and pollutants
harmful to the fish. And Enviros suck up millions of dollars each
year in order to 'restore' salmon habitat – by digging a hole in
the stream bed. Same thing miners do – for free! They're pretty
smart those soy-eating, sandal-wearing, yogurt knitters, aren't they?
Is this how far down our
politicians need to sink to find justification for their ideologies
and policies – using a dirty lawyer who stole her clients money,
then copped a psyche to try and get out of it, Girl,
Interrupted style? Really? What an absolute
disgrace to her office and her party Gael Tarleton is. For shame,
Mrs. Tarleton. For shame.
Unfortunately, the powers
that be are fully on board with the Phony Green Agenda, and are
taking our rights, our property and our freedom from all of us, one
Endangered Species scam at a time.
Oh, and Kimmy – I know
you're notorious for threatening people who try to expose you, with
law suits and all sorts of legal shenanigans, but, sweetie, you can't
sue somebody for libel or defamation WHEN THEY'RE TELLING THE TRUTH
ABOUT YOU! But go ahead, and make a bigger disgrace of yourself than
you already are. Go ahead and discredit yourself even further. If
you live in a glass house, you should stay away from stones. We have
no problem repeating all this in court.
SOURCES
– (Some interesting reading on the criminal - well worth a look to
learn about the case and the extent of what she did, and other
related links for your perusal.)
Shelterwood
Consulting – Dr. Fraud's 'Consulting' Business
In
case you're in the market for a convicted felon, thief, and disbarred
attorney to do some Eco-Pirate advocacy for you, here's the
jail-bird's 'consulting' website. http://www.shelterwoodconsulting.com/Home.html
Former
Attorney Kimberlee Ann McDonald Arrested (September 1st,
1993)
“McDonald,
38, is accused of manipulating accounts at the banks by writing
worthless checks totaling $170,000, drawn against various trust
accounts she maintained. She would then deposit the checks to other
accounts or use the money for partial payment of a loan, according to
prosecutors. She also is accused of inappropriately using $220,000
entrusted to her by her clients.”
Ex-Attorney
Sentenced for Thefts (March 15th,
1998)
“She
brought this on herself,” Peterson says of McDonald, and he
stresses that there were real victims who suffered real financial
hardships as a result of her actions. Moreover, he reveals what
McDonald does not: While she paid restitution to the defrauded bank
as a result of the federal case, most of her victimized clients
received nothing.”
“So
who is McDonald really—a reformed sinner or a scam artist?”
My
Impossible Dream : The Story of Chuck Randall (January 28th,
2008)
http://bit.ly/1FgV9gd “She
was sentenced to jail. Now, every three months or so, I get a check
for about fifteen dollars. Whoopee!”
Rep.
Gael Tarleton's Washington House Democrats Blog
[This post is lengthy but it is
necessarily so. It is loaded with evidence that proves our claims.
All information included in this article was procured either by
internet search or FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request. All
information and images are either freely available online or are part
of Public Record. Images and extracts that may be subject to copyright are displayed here underFAIR USE.
Please click on the images to enlarge.]
You may not know the name Donald
Rubenstein as yet. But you will. Mr. Rubenstein is going to be the
subject of much debate over the coming weeks. His name will probably
be appearing on local media outlets.
Donald Rubenstein is the Hearings
Officer for Jackson County, an unelected official who sits in
judgment of residents and citizens of the county, subverting due
process, since it is not a court of law and Mr. Rubenstein has sworn
no oath to uphold the Constitution. Much of what Mr. Rubenstein does
is make decisions on Land Use applications, like the one submitted to
him for the removal of Fielder Dam on Evans Creek. The dam was
removed in early August.
As a public official, even an appointed
one, he is required to disclose any and all information that could be
construed as a Conflict of Interest – this is a veritable
sport in Jackson and Josephine counties. In his RFP (Request for
Proposal) for the position of Hearings Officer for JaxCo, he made the
following statement –
We heartily disagree with that statement. We know of many, many conflicts of interest that may interfere with his ability to be an effective Hearings Officer.
At a public hearing in opposition the
the dam removal, called for by the family representative of the
alleged owners of the land upon which Fielder Dam sat, Mr Rubenstein
made a declaration before commencing proceedings. He stated –
“With respect to my, uh, personal participation I would like to disclose I know two people who are involved in one way or another in this application. Brian Barr, who is the applicant is a gentleman I have met on two, perhaps three occasions. I would hardly say we have a close personal relationship, but he is somebody who I have met and had a conversation or two with, from time to time. And secondly, the second applicant, the Geos Institute has on its board Ken Margolis who is a personal friend, and, uh, uh, whom I have known for a number of years. I can assure everyone I have had no contact with either of these people with respect to this issue, I never will have contact with either of these people with respect to this issue. That, I believe, would be improper. I agree I would have to disclose it if I had. But I have not had contact, I will not have contact with them about this matter.”
That isn't really the whole story of
Mr. Rubenstein's relationship with Geos Institute, Brian Barr
or a very important person he omitted to mention, Bob Hunter from
WaterWatch of Oregon. Mr. Hunter is the catalyst for many dam
removals in recent years, including this one.
Upon being asked by Rod Crume, the
representative of the alleged dam owners about his relationship with
Bob Hunter, Mr. Rubenstein was outraged and stated –
“Mr. Crume, I have made disclosures that are both required by law, and are honest and complete. Whatever contact I may have had with Mr. Hunter isn't relevant to this matter, because he is not a party to this matter. He is not the applicant, and does not appear on any of the filings. He may very well have participated in the work, uh, to remove this dam, but he is not a party, he's not an applicant. Now having said that, I will tell you, and I have no obligation to tell you – and you have failed in your decision, in your, uh, purpose in not offending me. I will tell you that I do know Mr. Hunter. Occasionally, perhaps four times. I am not a personal friend of his, and he, uh, this relationship bears absolutely no bearing on my decision.”
Mr. Rubenstein was visibly flustered by
the question; this is obvious in his somewhat rambling choice of
words. His statement, we believe, is entirely false. To say that Bob
Hunter “isn't relevant” to the Fielder Dam removal project is
preposterous. He is the heart and soul of the project, and was the
applicant to procure grant funding from Oregon Department of Fish
& Wildlife (ODFW) in Phase 1 of the project.
So, just how far does Mr. Rubenstein's relationship with these radical enviro groups go?
Very far, indeed. Quite disturbingly far, actually.
POINT ONE –
Mr. Rubenstein is the current Secretary
of the Southern Oregon Land Conservancy (SOLC) and has been a
member of this group since 2008. The SOLC office is at 84
4th Street, Ashland - the same address
as Geos Institute (a climate
change alarmist corporation who rake in millions per year to
brainwash the innocent and the ignorant.) Geos Institute
owns the building according to Jackson County Assessor's Office
records.
NOTE: Right now, this address is not searchable – it won't come up no
matter which permutation of the address we try. The only way it comes
up now is to leave the street blank, type in 84 where it says HOUSE
# and hit SEARCH.
Click on page3 of the results. You
will see the evidence of the image above.
POINT TWO –
Mr. Rubenstein is the founder of
several environmental groups, including but not limited to The
Marin Agricultural Land Trust, and the Land Trust Exchange
(now named the Land Trust Alliance with 1,700 chapters across
the US.) He also founded the Environmental Law Society at the
University of San Francisco. He has also been employed by enviro
groups, the Land Conservancy and the California Coastal
Conservancy. (Confirmation of all these can be found on his
LinkedIn page.)
Bob Hunter of WaterWatch of Oregon
(WaterWatch.org,) an overly-litigious and very aggressive
environmentalist group operating in Oregon and California, is a
thirty-plus year member of the SOLC and is a past board member
(1980s.) Mr Hunter, along with Brian Barr of the Geos Institute,
host nature hikes and birding trips (sometimes jointly,) for the
SOLC.
Mr. Hunter also received a conservation
award from the SOLC in 2015 and attended the 30th
anniversary of their first board meeting. Mr. Hunter donates money
to the SOLC on a regular basis.
SOLC currently runs a project
called Rogue River Preserve. On the “steering committee”
of this project are Mr. Rubenstein and Mr. Barr. Mr. Hunter is
listed as an “adviser” to this committee.
In an attempt to obscure the close
relationship between Brian Barr, the Geos Institute, and
Donald Rubenstein and the SOLC, a false address was listed for
the Geos Institute in the announcement for the public meeting
regarding the Fielder Dam removal. This meeting was requested by
Rodney Crume, representing the owners of the land on which the dam
allegedly sat.
The address, 89 Alder St, Central
Point is actually the address for the Jackson
Soil & Water Conservation District, [JSWCD] [a branch
of State Department of Agriculture,] and listed by Google as a
County Government Office. This address also houses the USDA
Farm Services Agency, Rural
Development, and the Natural
Resources Conservation Service. Also
housed is the Rogue River Watershed Council, a
Non-Profit organization of which Brian Barr is the Executive
Director. This is not the address of the Geos Institute,
which is, as stated above, 84 4th Street,
Ashland. We believe this address was used in an attempt to
willfully obscure the fact that Brian Barr's Geos Institute
and Donald Rubenstein's SOLC reside in the same building.
It should be noted that the 84 4th
Street address is not an office building, but a converted, one-story
house, owned by the Geos
Institute.
NOTE
: It should be noted that Geos Institute is the new name for the
notorious radical enviro group, Headwaters, Inc, also formerly known as NCCSP (National Center for Conservation Science & Policy.) The HISTORY of this
group is truly detestable. These are some of the very people responsible for the destruction of our counties and our natural resources jobs.
Those mentioned in this article are culpable in the poisoning of Evans
Creek.
There
is no excuse for the lack of EIS (Environmental Impact Statement)
prior to removing the dam.
There
is no excuse for threatening land owners with ruin should they not
comply.
There
is no excuse for illegally removing Wimer Dam BEFORE the permits were
in place.
There
is no excuse for creating the environmental disaster that has been
deliberately thrust upon Evans Creek and its residents, both human
and animal.
WaterWatch,
Geos Institute,
Bob Hunter, Brian Barr and Donald Rubenstein – there is no excuse
for what you have done, not in the name of ANYTHING or ANYONE, let alone fish.
It gives us no pleasure whatsoever to be proven right on this and we regret we have to report some very troubling findings as this story develops.
The initial lab results are in for the testing of samples from the former site of Fielder Dam on Evans Creek, a major tributary of the Rogue River.
The dam, demolished in a joint project by WaterWatch of Oregon and Geos Institute and their partners in crime River Design Group, Staton Construction, and various government agencies are all liable for the poisoning of the creek which has just resulted from the removal.
ALUMINUM, of which high levels in drinking water are indicated in Alzheimers and other cognitive impairment disorders, is recommended by the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) not to exceed 20 parts per million. The Fielder Dam sample tested at 17,605 parts per million.
ARSENIC, recommended by the EPA not to exceed 7 parts per BILLION, tested at 21.1 parts per MILLION! That means the result was "three magnitudes higher" than recommended for safe levels, according to Eric Schaafsma, Technical Director of Grants Pass Water Laboratory. That means 3000 times higher.
3 THOUSAND TIMES HIGHER. Let that sink in for a moment.
And that sample was just water, not sediment, where concentrations of heavy metals will be higher due to their weight. And that was only on the day demolition work began. At that time, only 2 feet of the dam had been removed.
There is 3/4 - 1 mile of sediment now sitting in the spot where Fielder Dam once stood. We estimate the sediment is at least 15 feet deep, perhaps deeper. As yet, we do not know how badly contaminated the sediments are, but those sediments, over time, will be working their way down the Rouge River and end up in Josephine County and Grants Pass water supplies.
Although Mr. Schaafsma didn't state the actual level of CHROMIUM tested, he said that he did not speciate, just tested entire Chromium level and it was "a concern."
People, this is serious. That contaminated water may have already reached our water supply. The even more contaminated sediments will follow over the course of months or years, depending on the water levels and flow in Evans Creek, presuming it will have water again at some point.
Mr. Schaafsma also reported that after the entire demolition was completed, the water at the former dam site was red and a "sheen." This tested as iron bacteria. The red color of the remaining water was caused by a huge release of iron build up behind the dam. He also reported traces of radioactive uranium.
They did this to improve 'salmon habitat.' What about our habitat? What about our rights to exist? Do WaterWatch and Geos Institute - the people responsible for this disaster - despise people so much that they wish us harm? Do they care so much about fish that they are willing to poison and sicken people, us, me, you, with deadly toxins? It should be noted that all the dams that have been removed and are DOWNSTREAM of where most of these self-righteous fish worshipers live - Ashland.
Please watch the entire video below to hear Mr. Schaafsma's worrying account of his test results, as given to the Josephine County Board of Commissioners on Thursday, 27th August, 2015.
Sources :
Jo Co Commissioners Meeting Video by Dale Matthews, BadCounty.com (Mr. Schaafsma's comments and the lab results were transcribed from this video.)
Sample Testing from Fielder Dam : Grants Pass Water Laboratory
"...for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap." - Galatians 6:7
Local 'clean water' advocates, (oh, the irony,)
Waterwatch of Oregon, Inc, have just caused what may be an ecological
disaster on Evans Creek, a major tributary of the Rogue River in
Southern Oregon.
In the following video clips, shot at
the location where Fielder Dam stood until last week, you will see
that the creek is now almost completely dry, filled with tons of
sediment piles, and what little water remains is filled with what is
more than likely toxic run-off from upstream. Samples have been
taken and will be analyzed directly.
CLICK HERE to see all 7 short clips from the Waterwatch / Geos Institute Fielder Dam removal site.
If one compares these clips with the
recent catastrophe in Colorado caused by the EPA, (Environmental Protection Agency, an inaptly named
oxymoronic agency if there ever was one,)
you will see that the color of the run-off is identical and may be
the same, or a similar substance.
The dam, one of two taken out in the
last month – the other was Wimer Dam near by – had long been the
target of local extremist environmental groups Waterwatch, and the
Geos Institute. Bob Hunter, attorney for Waterwatch, and Brian Barr
of Geos Institute, the applicant for the removal of the dam, have
both been at the forefront of this project for five years.
These are the men responsible for whatever has been released into the
watershed. Once it has been confirmed what the toxic run-off actually
is, these men will be brought to justice for their ecological crime.
When a dam is removed – or any
structure which has accumulated sediment behind it in a waterway –
an EIS (Environmental Impact Statement,) is required before some of the permits
are granted. No EIS was done, as far as we can tell. Wimer Dam was taken our without all the required permits in place.
The
preliminary sediment studies done were a joke. If you really want to
find out if there are heavy metals, like mercury, hexavalent
chromium, cadmium, etc, they are heavy, they sink – you have to dig
deep, way down to the bedrock where these substances will settle. If you
don't want to find them, take sediment samples off the top or a few
inches down and you will find what River Design Group found –
nothing. Which, we must assume, is just what they wanted to find.
River Design Group were contracted to oversee the permit process,
sample testing and the logistics of the dam removal.
Also currently under investigation are KS Wild and
the ubiquitous Waterwatch, the main advocates for the removal of the
Savage Rapids Dam, the Gold Ray Dam, and the Gold Hill Diversion Dam
in 2009 and 2010, and the subsequent probable poisoning of Grants Pass City
water. Stay tuned.
Check out this video from a public meeting regarding the removal of dams on the Klamath River. The meeting, from 2013, was attended by Waterwatch Project Manager, the smirking, superior Jim McCarthy. Also present was local activist Alan Ehr, who is EPA credentialed, and has been trying for years to get the authorities to listen to him about the toxicity potential of dam removal, and about the possible cancer cluster in Grants Pass from the removal of Savage Rapids and Gold Ray dams.
Enviros, cohorts, co-conspirators, hear this – your time of running rampant in our
region with impunity is over. A day of reckoning is coming and
all of you who have been involved in poisoning our water and killing our children will be
brought to justice – by using the laws, regulations and legislation
YOU crafted and lobbied for
to bludgeon us all with.
In the 1960s the Vintners of Napa
Valley teamed up with the burgeoning population of radical
environmentalists in an attempt to prevent the urbanization of their
valley. Back then, the number of wineries was much fewer than it is
today, and the vineyards were considerable smaller. Of course, that
was the biggest mistake the wine-makers made – getting into bed
with the Che Guevara t-shirt-wearing unwashed ones.
But in just a few short years, the
enviros turned against their vino-making buddies, accusing them of
causing soil erosion and run-off pollution of the waterways.
Today, the environmental extremist
contingent are attempting to destroy vineyards, farms, and anybody
else who dares to use water, in order to save a completely useless,
unimportant, short-lived, almost extinct little tiddler of a fish
called the Delta Smelt. It is, of course, listed under the ubiquitous
Endangered Species Act. (There are several other useless fish
species involved also, naturally, including the Lamprey – a hideous
giant worm with teeth which NEEDS to be extinct, in my opinion!)
Delta Smelt
During their March, 2015 survey, the
California Department of Fish & Wildlife found only a single
Delta Smelt.
To put this in perspective, the water
system where the Delta Smelt live – the Sacramento/San Joaquin
Valley River Delta – provides water for 20 million people.
Vineyards and farms are having their essential water supplies
diverted from them in order to service the fish.
Harry Cline of the Farm Press Blog
lamented that the state and federal water projects (such as the
campaign to save the Delta Smelt,) had wasted 800,000 acre-feet of
water in 2013. “That is enough to produce crops on 200,000 acres,
or 10 million tons of tomatoes, 200,000 million boxes of lettuce, 20
million tons of grapes.”
And sustain ONE USELESS FISH,
apparently.
Now, fearing their extinction, UC Davis
has started a fish breeding program at a US Fish & Wildlife
Service hatchery near the Shasta Dam in Northern California.
Here at this state-of-the-art facility,
the spoiled brat small-fry has temperature-controlled water which is
specially filtered and sanitized for them, and is fed six times a day
with specially made feed. The population is thriving in captivity.
The fish eggs are even artificially inseminated and DNA sequencing is
carried out to ensure gene pool diversity. Fish Eugenics!
This little fishy harem costs the
taxpayer $2.5 MILLION a year.
All this for a fish that makes
absolutely no contribution to the Enviros' precious eco-system. And
the whole thing is futile – the captivity-raised Smelt will be even
bigger pansies, even less-able to survive than their wild
counterparts. This is truly a ridiculous, frivolous, waste of money.
In Sonoma County the vineyards are now
being branded as the villains of the piece for using water to mist
their vines in the winter, thus protecting them from frost damage.
The Enviro contingent insist that this is a fish-killing action that
sucks rivers and creeks dry.
But ask Eric Stadnik, owner of
Green Pastures Valley and he will tell you like it is – “The
small farmer is the endangered species here.” He is living in fear
of bankruptcy, afraid he will lose his crops, or worse, his entire
livelihood.
Let this serve as a warning to
EVERYBODY who is supporting one enviro group or another –
they WILL turn against you once they're done using you to
further their agenda. They've done it to the vineyards, they've done
it to the farmers, they're even aggressing against their long-time
co-conspirators, the sport-fishermen.
They were warned, but they took no
heed. And we really hate to say told you so.
The best thing you can do for yourself
and your own prosperity is make sure you know WHO, exactly,
you are collaborating with, or donating your hard-earned cash to.
Check them out first, look into where they take money from, know who
is behind the benignly-named foundations and trusts they suck funding
from.
You might just be paying them to stab
you in the back.
“It's
easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been
fooled.” – Mark Twain.
“If
you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will
eventually come to believe it.” – [probable misquote popularly
attributed to] Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Party's Propaganda Minister.
[If you are
skeptical about so called 'global warming' or if you are against
radical extremist environmentalism, one is often called a
'right-winger.' So, let me just say, so there is no contention about
it, to be 'right-wing,' one would have to be ignorant enough to
believe in the false paradigm of the two-party system. Make no
mistake - the puppet on the left is bought and paid for by the same
group of people who pull the strings of the puppet on the right.]
For me, the
subject of radical environmentalism is not political, not in the
sense of left or right. It transcends the political and crosses over
into the realms of religious dogma. It is a wolf in sheep's clothing
that is eroding our freedom and our private lives, across class,
status, tax brackets, geography and other demographic identifiers.
This is, of
course, in reference to the the low-level, on-the-ground activists,
say, the local chapter of Owls R US whose spokesperson tells
us all how horrible we are and we should give up our land and water
rights for birds and fish and slugs. These people are what is
commonly know among the Powers That Be as Useful Idiots.
Think of them as the Green Gestapo of the enviro movement. In a hot
war they would be deemed cannon
fodder military Top Brass.
But the
Environmental movement is indeed political at its heart. The
sting-pullers of the entire hoax are a political elite who want to
control everything, down to where you can live and what you eat. The
common or garden radical enviro does not know they are a disposable
pawn in a global chess game. They have absolutely no idea. Like I
said, idiots, but
somewhat useful.
Radical
environmentalism is a religion. It is a cult. Its doctrine is rooted
in the philosophy of the German National Socialist Party, commonly
known as the Nazis. Hitler was a vegetarian who passed laws on
animal rights and had his military planting trees to save the
forests, whilst simultaneously exterminating millions of human
beings, and conducting barbarous medical experiments on others.
Although Hitler
and his Nazi Party didn't introduce environmentalism to Germany –
it was a long-standing, deep-rooted reaction, Europe-wide, to the
Industrial Revolution – they did turn it into the dangerous
extremist cult that it is today. They did value trees and fish
and animals over human lives. They had the same phobic stances on
hydro-electric dams across the Rhine as our own, home-grown
environmental terrorists do.
Terrorists?
Strong word. Is it warranted?
What else would
you call a group of people who threaten property owners with seizure
of their land, their home, and legal action if they do not consent to
the removal of a dam (to help some fishies,) that extends into their
property?
Like I said,
terrorists.
Today, Hitler
would be proud of the destruction to our human existence that radical
environmentalist groups are wreaking upon the population of southern
Oregon and elsewhere. From the eradication of our Natural Resources
jobs, state-wide, to the removal of dams which have allowed a slew of
toxic chemicals entry to our drinking water which may already be
linked to cancer clusters, and the incremental encroachment on
private property and property rights in the name of endangered
species habitats.
But it is not
just Oregon they are attempting to destroy. It's the whole of the
United States. The whole world. If you don't know what Agenda
21 is, Google it. This is the directive that all extremist
enviros are following, the same doctrine that our own domestic
agencies like BLM (the Bureau of Land Management) are ascribing to.
Just in case you
thing Agenda 21 is a conspiracy theory, it's not.
Buzz-phrases like
sustainable development, wildlands projects, and
global biodiversity will
pepper the literature produced by rogue government agencies and
radical enviros alike. BLM, for instance, are openly following UN
directives (which Agenda 21 is,) and completely flouting federal law
on a massive scale. In fact, their lawlessness is tantamount to
sedition. They are seizing private property from US citizens, all in
the name of fish, trees and owls and global biodiversity,
wildlands projects, and
sustainable
development. Our
jobs (especially in the area of natural resources,) are being
eradicated via endless lawsuits being brought against a
hardly-objecting, envirocentric BLM and other agencies.
“Land
…cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals
and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market.
Private land ownership is also a principle instrument of accumulation
and concentration of wealth, therefore, contributes to social
injustice.” – UN's Habitat I, the
first United Nations Conference on Human Settlements,
Vancouver,
Canada, 1976.
This
is what the average so-called 'environmentalist' believes. This is
what the real
agenda is. So, to be clear, YOU
working hard for a living to buy yourself and your family a nice home
to grow up and grow older in is SOCIALLY
UNJUST.
Unless, of course, you are the chairman of an enviro group on $65,000
a year who begs money from huge conglomerate corporations, and have a
Redwood deck that cost thousands of dollars whilst taking the jobs of
loggers all over the region. (Yes, YOU,
George Sexton from KS
Wild.)
This
level of hypocrisy is rife within the so-called environmentalism
movement. Another example would be the enviro parasite group the
Sierra Fund
currently dredging the rivers to remove
toxins.
I suppose they throw the gold back in the river, do they? No, they
don't, funnily enough – they MARKET it and SELL it under the
moniker E3 Gold Initiative.
These
are the insurgents currently trying to destroy all small-scale mining
– but not mining for the conglomerates corporations, of course, and
not for themselves. A truly disgusting and diabolical group of
shysters, in my humble opinion, with the integrity, human decency and
warmth of a festering dead fish.
These
enviro groups preach to us about saving the trees and fish whilst
taking money from the likes of the Weeden Foundation who have funded white-supremacist groups, Eugenics research, and the
baby killers at Planned Parenthood. They proselytize, urging us to
convert to their religion and worship the pristine
waterways
they claim to protect, whilst making sure that the rivers are
actually deadly cesspools, for the fish as well as us. The removal of
the Savage Rapids and Gold Ray dams killed thousands of fish.
Skin-crawlingly embarrassing hypocrisy that would be comical – if
it wasn't for the death and destruction that is coming our way
because of what they have done.
All of this nonsense is tied up with the
controlled, so-called feminist movement, liberalism, socialism, and
the rabid yelling of “that's racist!” at anybody who dares to
disagree with somebody who is of a different ethnicity. All of these
things are inextricably linked to the other. They are all designed to
undermine our family ties, our rights, our possessions, and our very
minds. They attempt to make us fear saying ANYTHING to ANYONE, in
case we offend somebody.
So, what does that all have to do with Nazis?
Social
control.
It's
all about control. Control of everything.
Control of everyone.
Control of your life. Control of your mind, your thoughts, your very
existence. Control of you, your children. Hitler's utopia.
There is a very sinister and dark undercurrent
that flows beneath the surface of the environmental movement. It is a
movement driven by hate, populated by people who despise everybody,
and none more than themselves, and who are hell-bent on the
destruction of life as we know it.
They want a personal apocalypse for each and
every one of us. They want to tell us that we can't go down that
road in the woods with an ATV because a rare slug lives there.
They want to take private property from us
because a family of Northern Spotted Owls was discovered on the land.
They want small-scale mining and Mom & Pop
logging outfits eliminated from the face of the earth, so that the
sources of their funding – corporate mining and logging companies,
and other global-corps like Exxon and Monsanto, and the foundations
who invest in them, can get richer and richer, rape the land, kill
the fish, extinct the owls and clear-cut all the trees, while the
rest of us should just go off and die quietly and leave them to carry
out their anti-humanist agenda.
They want us to drink water which is now filled
with deadly toxins because they removed our dams without doing an
Environmental Impact Study. They (the City Council and the Enviros,)
were told by an expert, a man who is former EPA (Environmental
Protection Agency,) what would happen if those poisons were released
down the river by removing the dams without first excavating the
toxic sediment. They knew. They knew. And now it's
happening.
Monsters.
This is what they are. These are the things they are doing to us.
Anybody who puts an owl habitat above jobs and people making a living
to feed their kids just simply not
right. They
gouge the agencies with their Sue
& Settle
tactics, collectively making millions of dollars each year whilst
jobs disappear, water is tainted, and farms turn into deserts because
they've had their water rights taken from them to save the salmon.
There
will be a holocaust in America, one where tens of millions will
ultimately die – not by the hand of a political dictator, but by
the hand of the Green
Reich rising,
the so-called Environmental movement who are carrying out human
sacrifices to save trees, fish and owls.
